Liberals: Stop Incorrectly using the word “Muslim” as a Synonym for Arab and Brown

I saw this post on FB that read, “Nobody cares about the terrorist attack in Baghdad, I guess Muslim lives don’t matter to the media as much as American and European lives.”

This sentence doesn’t make any sense. It is structurally incorrect. Islam is a religion, and America and Europe are locations. They are not like terms to compare.

To make this sentence structurally correct, you’d have to say, “I guess Baghdad lives don’t matter to the media as much as American and European lives” OR “I guess Muslim lives don’t matter to the media as much as Christian lives.”

Now at least we’re comparing like terms, but still, the last sentence posits an argument in itself, as it assumes everyone in America and Europe are Christian, when there are many atheists and Muslims there. But the original structurally incorrect sentence posits the same problem: using “Muslim” to describe all of Baghdad, when there are Christians and atheists there.

Liberals¬†have got to get out of the habit of using “Muslim” to mean brown and Arab. It has nothing to do with race or nationality. It is a religion that one can change at any time, yet people throw it around like it’s a genetic DNA trait. Why?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s